JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 24, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Claudia Constanza Camacho Jacome

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Nulidad De La Sentencia T-268/05. Obligación De Vinculacion Del Tercero Afectado Por Los Resultados Del Proceso Por Parte Del Juez De Tutela. Declarar La Nulidad Del Proceso De Tutela Del Señor Victor Hugo Orjuela Guerrero Contra La Alcaldía Mayor De Bogota, Incluida La Sentencia T-268/05, Desde El Auto Que Admitio La Solicitud
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Nulidad Por Falta De Notificacion
  • Tercero con interés legítimo en tutela
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (2 points)
  1. Primero. DECLARAR LA NULIDAD del proceso de tutela del senor Victor Hugo Orjuela Guerrero contra la Alcaldia Mayor de Bogota, incluida la Sentencia T-268 de 2005, desde el auto por medio del cual el Juzgado 34 Penal Municipal de Bogota admitio la solicitud correspondiente.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR, por intermedio de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional, la remision del expediente T-1012122 al Juzgado 34 Penal Municipal de Bogota para que este, permitiendo el ejercicio del derecho de defensa de la senora Claudia Constanza Camacho Jacome, asi como del senor Carlos Arturo Remolina Gomez, renueve la actuacion y decida nuevamente el asunto sometido a su consideracion.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.